MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process., This news data comes from:http://www.gyglfs.com
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal

“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
- Marcos confers diplomatic merit award on two ambassadors
- Marcos expresses support for ‘beleaguered’ Cabinet members
- Indonesian leader fires ministers of finance and security after deadly protests
- Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce engaged
- DPWH seeks lookout bulletin vs officials, contractors in ghost projects
- Sotto allows detained Public Works engineer to attend House probe on flood control projects
- US appeals court blocks Trump's use of wartime law for deportations
- Pagasa monitors LPA off Cavite, may still become tropical depression
- Nartatez relieves Fajardo as PNP spokesman
- Applicability of zero-balance billing questioned